Country Wine Judging
Written By: Greg Martin
Creation Date: Thursday June 10th 2010
Last Updated: Thursday August 29th 2019
Committee: Greg Martin(Convenor), Harry Gilham, George Wright, David Hart and Tim Ross.
Report Prepared by: Greg Martin
Recommendations: Country Wine Judging.
Summary.
1. Hybrid Class.
2. Frankston Country Wine Judges.
3. Senior Country Wines Judge.
4. Tasting Table.
5. Combine Dry & Sweet classes.
6. ‘Tick-the box’ Judging Sheet.
7. Judging comments.
8. The Entrant’s Message.
9. An “Experimental Class”.
10. Judging Guidelines.
1. Hybrid Class.
Recommendation: A new Hybrid Class be trialled at the 2010 Wine Show.
A Hybrid Class is defined as a combination of grape and country wine base material, examples could include:
• Shiraz + Plum + Spices
• Cabernet + Blackcurrant + Plum + Blackberry
• Merlot + Mulberry (Italy) + Plum
• Riesling + Lemon + Lime + Flowers
• Sauvignon Blanc + Gooseberry + Flowers
• Pinot + Strawberry and Raspberry
Action 1: Add a Hybrid Class to the Show package.
Action 2: Specify that Entrants mark on the wine label the ingredients by percentages, e.g. Chardonnay 90%: Feijoa 10%
2. Frankston Country Wine Judges.
Recommendation: Extend an invitation to country wine judges from the Frankston Wine Guild.
Mr Chris Myers knowledge and experience in the country wine field is of the highest level and his inclusion will be a valuable addition to the judging team in 2010. The addition of non-Eltham judges in the area of country wine will also give the judging panel a wider scope of experience and expertise.
Action 3: An invitation is extended to Mr Chris Myers.
3. Senior Country Wines Judge.
Recommendation: The Appointment of a Senior Country Wines Judge.
Country wines can have a multitude of base materials and is a complex task to assess. Some ingredients are rare and obscure. It is recommended that a senior country judge is appointed to act as a support to the other country wine judges.
This judge may or may not have a role in judging individual country wine classes.
This judge will take on a roving role whereby they can be invited to assist with difficult entries, help with the resolution of disagreement and validate medal and near-medal wines.
This process will also help justify the Guild's comprehensive processing of entries to Entrants.
This role has no jurisdiction over the grape judging.
It is recommended that the first Senior Country Wines Judge in 2010 be Mr Harry Gilham.
Action 4: This role is further delineated by the Show Director.
4. Tasting Table.
Recommendation: It is proposed that an additional country wine tasting table be assembled at the wine show for various country wine judges, associates and stewards to practise the art of formal judging.
We need to empower our own members in the art of country wine judging and develop our own standards of excellence. This table could be organised by the senior judge.
Action 5: The Logistics Working Group provide an additional tasting table.
Action 6: This table could be over-seen by the senior country wines judge.
5. Combine Dry & Sweet Classes.
Recommendation: Combine dry & sweet style classes into single fruit-type classes.
Presently a single fruit can be spread across different classes both dry and sweet. We would like to taste the same fruits in the same class as per the Frankston Wine Guild’s lead.
We request that the entrant record the Specific Gravity on the entry label then the judges can taste in order of S.G.
Action 7: Reduce the sweet and dry categories into a single classes.
Action 8: Specify the need for S.G. to be recorded on the label of the entry.
6. "Tick-the-Box" Judging Sheet.
Recommendation: The use of a ‘tick-the box’ judging sheet for country wine.
We intend to propose a new judging sheet for country wines to present to the wine show committee.
The use of this tool in the 2010 show is restricted as a resource to assist judges compile the usual set of judging comments which are recorded in the show results booklet. These sheets will be trialled and not given to entrants for the trial year.
Action 9: Create a ‘tick-the-box’ country wine judging sheet.
7. Judging Comments.
Recommendation: Judging Comments need to be constructive, substantial and no lower than 13.0 points.
As a general approach, the judging comments need to be constructive. Comments need to be substantial in quantity so as to justify the entrants fee. A single line comment is unsatisfactory.
A problem wine to have the lowest score of 13/20, no wines are to be judged as less than this number. Judges that forget this can have the score risen to this score by the wine show administrators.
Action 10: Judging sheets need to be proof-read prior to the recording process for the show results booklet.
8. The Entrant’s Message.
Recommendation: Entrants are given the ability to add a message with their entry.
We wish to allow Entrants the ability to pass a message to the judge that helps define their wine, e.g. for an obscure base material like Balm of Gilead, an Entrant may describe the shrub’s leaves and its aromatic properties. This is Harry’s “Telegram Idea”; a maximum of 25 words.
Action 11: This message needs to be added to the judging sheets.
9. An "Experimental Class".
Recommendation: Create an “Experimental Class” in the Wine Show.
Experimentation of wine making is to be encouraged at all costs.
To encourage the weird and the wacky entries like the sardine liqueur and the wine jelly a new “experimental class” could be considered. Though technically these can be squashed into existing classes, these “frontier” types of entries go against the spirit of existing classes and deserve their own new class.
Action 12: Create an experimental class.
10. Judging Guidelines.
Recommendation: Begin the formulation of judging guidelines for C-Wine classes.
Each country wine class has a host of factors that can indicate quality and these can vary for each class, for instance, judging clarity for a one year old meade is more relaxed when compared to a three year old meade and the flavour intensity for vegetable wine is not expected to be as high as we would expect as per a plum wine. This is a long term research and compilation process.
Action 13: A long term project requiring successful winemakers, senior judges and further research.
Back to top